![]() |
|||||
![]() |
The autocratic leadership style is also known as the directive style of leadership. They typically tell their subordinates what to do, how exactly to do it and what is expected of them and specifying conditions for good performance and deadlines. Generally these leaders work best where there is: • an extreme urgency When the time is very tight, you wouldn’t want anyone else to give you creative feedback or ways to improve, what you need is the objective to be met as soon as possible. While listening to feedback is important, there comes a time where the feedback wastes more time than is required and affects the completing of the tasks. Another place the autocratic style work best in is the armed forces. In the armed forces, when orders are passed in the battlefield, you need your men to do exactly as they’re told immediately. Any delay in executing the order could mean life or death in the battlefield. And it’s the same in say, the trading floor of a brokerage. You need people to move fast because every second counts, and millions exchange hands every second in the trading world. During these times, you don’t need feedback, you need conformance and swift execution. My view is that this style should only be used in the two situations I mentioned above. Other than that, where there is time, I believe that a leader should not use this style, but rather take time to listen to feedback on ways to improve certain decisions or methods. Other Theories of |
||||